Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LFGSX
GFACX vs LFGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LFGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Lord Abbett Focused Growth R4
Price$37.06
Change-$1.26 (-3.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets90.21M
GFACX vs LFGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LFGSX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LFGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. LFGSX (90.2M). GFACX (0.00) and LFGSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LFGSX: GFACX (24 years) vs LFGSX (6 years). LFGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 169.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). LFGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LFGSX (0) vs GFACX (250). LFGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.79 vs. GFACX (10.15). LFGSX return over 5 years is better than : 91.03 vs. GFACX (32.83).
| GFACX | LFGSX | GFACX / LFGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | 2.066 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 90.2M | 337,029% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | 33.79 | 30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 50.77 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | 91.03 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | N/A | - |