Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LGLAX
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$56.58
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$39.25
Change-$0.06 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.72B
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLAX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and LGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. LGLAX (5.72B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLAX (0.91). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFACX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.17 vs. GFACX (-4.76). LGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.18 vs. GFACX (27.92).
| GFACX | LGLAX | GFACX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.261 | -16.787 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 5.72B | 4,565% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.76 | 7.17 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.62 | 20.10 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.92 | 35.18 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.91 | 68.14 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers