Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LGLAX
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$47.90
Change-$1.78 (-3.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.16B
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLAX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LGLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. LGLAX (7.16B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFACX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.63 vs. GFACX (10.15). LGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 53.04 vs. GFACX (32.83).
| GFACX | LGLAX | GFACX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | 1.397 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 7.16B | 4,245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | 27.63 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 43.33 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | 53.04 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | 105.93 | 53% |