Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LGLAX
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$61.97
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$43.80
Change-$0.29 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.42B
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLAX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. LGLAX (6.42B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLAX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLAX (0.90). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFACX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.17 vs. GFACX (1.11). LGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.21 vs. GFACX (34.48).
| GFACX | LGLAX | GFACX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.90 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.90 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.807 | -7.282 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 6.42B | 4,442% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.11 | 17.17 | 6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.22 | 55.60 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.48 | 38.21 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.30 | 90.85 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...