Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LGLAX
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.04
Change+$0.58 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$48.59
Change+$0.34 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLAX commentary
Dec 24, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and LGLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 301B vs. LGLAX (7.27B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLAX (13 years). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFACX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.10 vs. GFACX (17.61). LGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 70.01 vs. GFACX (38.27).
| GFACX | LGLAX | GFACX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.200 | 47.689 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301B | 7.27B | 4,140% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.61 | 48.10 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.26 | 22.15 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.27 | 70.01 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.73 | 117.05 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...