Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LGLAX
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.20
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders A
Price$47.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFACX vs LGLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLAX commentary
Nov 22, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 302B vs. LGLAX (7.17B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLAX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLAX (13 years). LGLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLAX: GFACX (250) vs LGLAX (1500). LGLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.98 vs. GFACX (26.05). LGLAX return over 5 years is better than : 75.25 vs. GFACX (46.77).
| GFACX | LGLAX | GFACX / LGLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 27.636 | 46.495 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302B | 7.17B | 4,211% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.05 | 51.98 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.84 | -10.39 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.77 | 75.25 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.41 | 115.68 | 48% |