Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLCX
GFACX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.93
Change+$0.40 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$48.19
Change+$0.21 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.12B
GFACX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLCX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and LGLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. LGLCX (8.12B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLCX (14 years). LGLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFACX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.02 vs. GFACX (12.61). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.99 vs. LGLCX (18.67).
| GFACX | LGLCX | GFACX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.65 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.65 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.087 | 19.353 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 8.12B | 4,200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.61 | 34.02 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.21 | 114.01 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.99 | 18.67 | 187% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.56 | 116.81 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement