Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LGLCX
GFACX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$67.28
Change+$0.60 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.75B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$42.11
Change+$0.26 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
GFACX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLCX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. LGLCX (7.39B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLCX (14 years). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFACX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.39 vs. GFACX (20.31). LGLCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.09 vs. GFACX (43.12).
| GFACX | LGLCX | GFACX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.521 | 4.104 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 7.39B | 4,197% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.31 | 41.39 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.25 | 36.81 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.12 | 54.09 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.91 | 96.39 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers