Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLCX
GFACX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.96
Change+$0.29 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.95B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$43.38
Change+$0.11 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4B
GFACX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. LGLCX (7.4B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLCX (14 years). LGLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFACX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.61 vs. GFACX (7.11). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.91 vs. LGLCX (25.89).
| GFACX | LGLCX | GFACX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.65 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.65 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.292 | 7.637 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324B | 7.4B | 4,377% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | 22.61 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.01 | 82.19 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.91 | 25.89 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.31 | 79.92 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement