Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLIX
GFACX vs LGLIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.70
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders I
Price$59.40
Change-$0.31 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
GFACX vs LGLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLIX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and LGLIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. LGLIX (8.16B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLIX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLIX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLIX (0.65). LGLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLIX: GFACX (250) vs LGLIX (1000000). LGLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.27 vs. GFACX (15.58). LGLIX return over 5 years is better than : 47.43 vs. GFACX (39.11).
| GFACX | LGLIX | GFACX / LGLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.158 | 20.189 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 8.16B | 4,118% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.58 | 42.27 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.17 | 101.93 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 47.43 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.02 | 158.37 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement