Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLIX
GFACX vs LGLIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.38
Change-$0.14 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders I
Price$57.15
Change+$0.14 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.82B
GFACX vs LGLIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLIX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and LGLIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. LGLIX (7.82B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLIX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLIX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLIX (0.65). LGLIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLIX: GFACX (250) vs LGLIX (1000000). LGLIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.98 vs. GFACX (19.28). LGLIX return over 5 years is better than : 39.12 vs. GFACX (32.87).
| GFACX | LGLIX | GFACX / LGLIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.65 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.951 | 14.754 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 7.82B | 4,154% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.28 | 50.98 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.98 | 80.30 | 49% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.87 | 39.12 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.31 | 134.61 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement