Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLQX
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$67.05
Change+$0.64 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R2
Price$46.74
Change+$0.47 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.06B
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLQX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. LGLQX (7.06B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLQX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLQX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLQX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLQX (1.25). LGLQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLQX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLQX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.09 vs. GFACX (7.19). LGLQX return over 5 years is better than : 40.21 vs. GFACX (35.43).
| GFACX | LGLQX | GFACX / LGLQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.25 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.25 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.160 | 2.367 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305B | 7.06B | 4,321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | 23.09 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.50 | 63.21 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.43 | 40.21 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.69 | 96.39 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement