Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LGLQX
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$54.00
Change+$0.15 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.76B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R2
Price$35.30
Change+$0.50 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.3B
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLQX commentary
Apr 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LGLQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 249B vs. LGLQX (5.3B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLQX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLQX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLQX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLQX (1.26). LGLQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLQX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLQX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.16 vs. GFACX (-11.52). LGLQX return over 5 years is better than : 44.94 vs. GFACX (42.01).
| GFACX | LGLQX | GFACX / LGLQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.26 | 108% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.26 | 108% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.543 | -23.009 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249B | 5.3B | 4,695% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.52 | -4.16 | 277% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.67 | 3.39 | -256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.01 | 44.94 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.40 | 50.45 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers