Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLQX
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.96
Change+$0.29 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.72B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R2
Price$48.88
Change+$0.13 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.4B
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLQX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. LGLQX (7.4B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLQX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLQX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLQX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLQX (1.25). LGLQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLQX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLQX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.11 vs. GFACX (7.11). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.91 vs. LGLQX (32.26).
| GFACX | LGLQX | GFACX / LGLQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.25 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.25 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.292 | 7.854 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 7.4B | 4,363% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | 23.11 | 31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.01 | 84.38 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.91 | 32.26 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.31 | 96.65 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement