Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLQX
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.93
Change+$0.40 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R2
Price$54.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.12B
GFACX vs LGLQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLQX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and LGLQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. LGLQX (8.12B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLQX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLQX: GFACX (25 years) vs LGLQX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLQX (1.25). LGLQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLQX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLQX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.57 vs. GFACX (12.61). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.99 vs. LGLQX (24.65).
| GFACX | LGLQX | GFACX / LGLQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.25 | 109% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.25 | 109% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.087 | 19.712 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 8.12B | 4,200% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.61 | 34.57 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.21 | 116.61 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.99 | 24.65 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.56 | 137.01 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement