Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LGLRX
GFACX vs LGLRX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$56.51
Change-$2.32 (-3.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$37.62
Change-$1.66 (-4.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.97B
GFACX vs LGLRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLRX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and LGLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. LGLRX (5.97B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLRX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLRX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLRX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLRX (1.16). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLRX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.03 vs. GFACX (-3.95). LGLRX return over 5 years is better than : 49.58 vs. GFACX (40.74).
| GFACX | LGLRX | GFACX / LGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.16 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.16 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.732 | -13.308 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272B | 5.97B | 4,555% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.95 | 7.03 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.35 | 23.60 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.74 | 49.58 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.82 | 68.44 | 57% |