Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs LGLRX
GFACX vs LGLRX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$69.49
Change-$0.64 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets320.84B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$47.99
Change-$1.12 (-2.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.45B
GFACX vs LGLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLRX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 321B vs. LGLRX (7.45B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLRX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLRX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLRX (14 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than LGLRX (1.15). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLRX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.47 vs. GFACX (9.32). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 38.43 vs. LGLRX (35.74).
| GFACX | LGLRX | GFACX / LGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.15 | 118% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.15 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.991 | 8.387 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 321B | 7.45B | 4,310% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.32 | 25.47 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.67 | 89.25 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.43 | 35.74 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.52 | 109.34 | 60% |