Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MCGFX
GFACX vs MCGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MCGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$13.81
Change-$0.10 (-0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets211.86M
GFACX vs MCGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MCGFX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MCGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. MCGFX (212M). GFACX (0.00) and MCGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MCGFX: GFACX (24 years) vs MCGFX (31 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than MCGFX (0.97). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: GFACX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.14 vs. MCGFX (6.75). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. MCGFX (-37.68).
| GFACX | MCGFX | GFACX / MCGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.97 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.198 | 13.644 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 212M | 156,604% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | 6.75 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.18 | 33.09 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | -37.68 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.85 | -45.33 | -176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement