Ad is loading...
GFACX vs MCGFX
GFACX vs MCGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MCGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$11.11
Change+$0.19 (+1.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets175.29M
GFACX vs MCGFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MCGFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MCGFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. MCGFX (175M). GFACX (0.00) and MCGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MCGFX: GFACX (24 years) vs MCGFX (30 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than MCGFX (0.97). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: GFACX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.10 vs. MCGFX (-13.88). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. MCGFX (-35.78).
| GFACX | MCGFX | GFACX / MCGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.97 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.959 | -10.784 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 175M | 149,143% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.10 | -13.88 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.19 | -9.13 | -24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.34 | -35.78 | -104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.37 | -57.87 | -61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...