Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MCGFX
GFACX vs MCGFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MCGFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.53
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
AMG Montrusco Bolton Large Cap Growth N
Price$13.92
Change-$0.03 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets213.49M
GFACX vs MCGFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MCGFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MCGFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. MCGFX (213M). GFACX (0.00) and MCGFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MCGFX: GFACX (24 years) vs MCGFX (31 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than MCGFX (0.97). MCGFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCGFX: GFACX (250) vs MCGFX (2000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. MCGFX (6.00). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.56 vs. MCGFX (-35.48).
| GFACX | MCGFX | GFACX / MCGFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.97 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.755 | 13.971 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 213M | 154,460% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.43 | 6.00 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.41 | 17.95 | 203% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.56 | -35.48 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.60 | -48.56 | -141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement