Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MIGBX
GFACX vs MIGBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MIGBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.62
Change+$0.69 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk B
Price$33.36
Change+$0.23 (+0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.12B
GFACX vs MIGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MIGBX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and MIGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. MIGBX (12.1B). GFACX (0.00) and MIGBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MIGBX: GFACX (24 years) vs MIGBX (32 years). MIGBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MIGBX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIGBX: GFACX (250) vs MIGBX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.68 vs. MIGBX (-3.08). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.40 vs. MIGBX (20.30).
| GFACX | MIGBX | GFACX / MIGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.46 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.46 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.759 | 4.315 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 12.1B | 2,669% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.68 | -3.08 | -282% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.72 | 21.53 | 245% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.40 | 20.30 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.66 | 51.74 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement