Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MIGBX
GFACX vs MIGBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MIGBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.70
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk B
Price$33.75
Change-$0.10 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.91B
GFACX vs MIGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MIGBX commentary
Sep 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MIGBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MIGBX (11.9B). GFACX (0.00) and MIGBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MIGBX: GFACX (25 years) vs MIGBX (32 years). MIGBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MIGBX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIGBX: GFACX (250) vs MIGBX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.58 vs. MIGBX (-3.18). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. MIGBX (12.88).
| GFACX | MIGBX | GFACX / MIGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.46 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.46 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.158 | 5.535 | 310% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 11.9B | 2,824% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.58 | -3.18 | -489% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.17 | 21.23 | 250% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 12.88 | 304% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.02 | 60.50 | 136% |