Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MIGBX
GFACX vs MIGBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MIGBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.97
Change-$0.51 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk B
Price$33.64
Change-$0.33 (-0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.54B
GFACX vs MIGBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MIGBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MIGBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. MIGBX (11.5B). GFACX (0.00) and MIGBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MIGBX: GFACX (25 years) vs MIGBX (32 years). MIGBX (1.46) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MIGBX (19.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIGBX: GFACX (250) vs MIGBX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.07 vs. MIGBX (-4.23). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 24.08 vs. MIGBX (5.56).
| GFACX | MIGBX | GFACX / MIGBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.46 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.46 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.445 | 6.223 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 11.5B | 2,870% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | -4.23 | -120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.86 | 22.33 | 246% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.08 | 5.56 | 433% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.66 | 51.90 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement