Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MLACX
GFACX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.59
Change+$1.38 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.96B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.73
Change+$0.06 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.82B
GFACX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MLACX commentary
Aug 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. MLACX (13.8B). GFACX (0.00) and MLACX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MLACX: GFACX (24 years) vs MLACX (20 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: GFACX (250) vs MLACX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.39 vs. MLACX (-20.10). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.27 vs. MLACX (-45.32).
| GFACX | MLACX | GFACX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.89 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.849 | 10.256 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 13.8B | 2,384% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.39 | -20.10 | -62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.40 | -17.45 | -249% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.27 | -45.32 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.43 | -45.88 | -191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement