Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MLACX
GFACX vs MLACX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MLACX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.23
Change+$0.53 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
NYLI Winslow Large Cap Growth
Price$4.89
Change+$0.06 (+1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.22B
GFACX vs MLACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MLACX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MLACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. MLACX (14.2B). GFACX (0.00) and MLACX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than MLACX: GFACX (25 years) vs MLACX (20 years). MLACX (1.89) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). MLACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 70.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MLACX: GFACX (250) vs MLACX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.62 vs. MLACX (-17.54). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.92 vs. MLACX (-42.81).
| GFACX | MLACX | GFACX / MLACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.88 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.89 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.158 | 13.986 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 14.2B | 2,380% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.62 | -17.54 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.98 | -8.26 | -666% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.92 | -42.81 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.95 | -47.48 | -175% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement