Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MSHMX
GFACX vs MSHMX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHMX
GFACX vs MSHMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHMX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MSHMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MSHMX (3.77M). MSHMX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHMX (0.53) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHMX: GFACX (26 years) vs MSHMX (6 years). MSHMX (6.28) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.35). MSHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHMX: GFACX (250) vs MSHMX (1000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.39 vs. MSHMX (-13.55). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 3.85 vs. MSHMX (-16.87).
| GFACX | MSHMX | GFACX / MSHMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.85 | 159% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 6.28 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.529 | 3.533 | 241% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 3.77M | 9,375,830% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.53 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.39 | -13.55 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.46 | 5.31 | 649% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.85 | -16.87 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers