Ad is loading...
GFACX vs MSHOX
GFACX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$62.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$12.62
Change+$0.07 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.74M
GFACX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHOX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and MSHOX is a Sell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. MSHOX (4.74M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHOX (1.28) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFACX (24 years) vs MSHOX (5 years). MSHOX (14.88) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFACX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.60 vs. MSHOX (-0.11). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.66 vs. MSHOX (10.03).
| GFACX | MSHOX | GFACX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.95 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 14.88 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.682 | 2.785 | -96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 4.74M | 5,990,297% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.28 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.60 | -0.11 | -1,471% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.28 | 20.44 | 138% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.66 | 10.03 | 345% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...