Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MSHOX
GFACX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$67.35
Change+$0.65 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.77B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.37
Change+$0.16 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38M
GFACX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHOX commentary
Jun 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. MSHOX (5.38M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHOX (1.18) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFACX (24 years) vs MSHOX (5 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFACX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). MSHOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.18 vs. GFACX (4.53). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.01 vs. MSHOX (15.97).
| GFACX | MSHOX | GFACX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.95 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 13.89 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.611 | 16.380 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 5.38M | 5,686,675% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.18 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.53 | 11.18 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.51 | 30.79 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.01 | 15.97 | 226% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement