Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MSHOX
GFACX vs MSHOX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHOX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.70
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence C
Price$14.74
Change-$0.13 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.59M
GFACX vs MSHOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHOX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MSHOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. MSHOX (5.6M). MSHOX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHOX (1.10) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHOX: GFACX (25 years) vs MSHOX (5 years). MSHOX (13.89) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). MSHOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHOX: GFACX (250) vs MSHOX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.58 vs. MSHOX (13.92). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. MSHOX (11.09).
| GFACX | MSHOX | GFACX / MSHOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.95 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 13.89 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.158 | 20.721 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 5.6M | 6,005,362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.58 | 13.92 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.17 | 34.81 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 11.09 | 353% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.02 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement