Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MSHPX
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.44
Change-$0.49 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$15.62
Change-$0.19 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.78M
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHPX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and MSHPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. MSHPX (5.78M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHPX (2.20) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: GFACX (25 years) vs MSHPX (6 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: GFACX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). MSHPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.35 vs. GFACX (12.87). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 33.31 vs. MSHPX (15.14).
| GFACX | MSHPX | GFACX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 10.50 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.319 | 23.516 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 5.78M | 5,937,338% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.87 | 16.35 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.12 | 51.19 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.31 | 15.14 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement