Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MSHPX
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.35
Change+$0.38 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$14.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.36M
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MSHPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. MSHPX (5.36M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHPX (2.20) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: GFACX (25 years) vs MSHPX (6 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: GFACX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.83 vs. MSHPX (4.08). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 25.13 vs. MSHPX (3.35).
| GFACX | MSHPX | GFACX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 10.50 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.041 | 13.984 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 5.36M | 6,097,334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.83 | 4.08 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.67 | 25.95 | 215% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.13 | 3.35 | 750% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement