Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MSHPX
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$69.20
Change+$0.71 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.68B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$15.22
Change+$0.07 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44M
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHPX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and MSHPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 314B vs. MSHPX (5.44M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHPX (2.38) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: GFACX (24 years) vs MSHPX (5 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: GFACX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). MSHPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.99 vs. GFACX (7.84). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. MSHPX (27.96).
| GFACX | MSHPX | GFACX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 10.50 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.532 | 18.359 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 314B | 5.44M | 5,769,938% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 15.99 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.29 | 38.82 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 27.96 | 154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement