Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MSHPX
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.41
Change-$0.22 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.91B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$14.48
Change+$0.06 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.18M
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and MSHPX is a Sell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. MSHPX (5.18M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHPX (2.38) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: GFACX (24 years) vs MSHPX (5 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: GFACX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). MSHPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.77 vs. GFACX (6.51). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.58 vs. MSHPX (17.30).
| GFACX | MSHPX | GFACX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 10.50 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.501 | 12.656 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 5.18M | 5,908,477% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.38 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 8.77 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.78 | 27.80 | 114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.58 | 17.30 | 200% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement