Ad is loading...
GFACX vs MSHPX
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$12.65
Change-$0.65 (-4.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.77M
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHPX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and MSHPX is a Sell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. MSHPX (4.77M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHPX (2.58) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: GFACX (24 years) vs MSHPX (5 years). MSHPX (11.18) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 100.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: GFACX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.75 vs. MSHPX (-3.85). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. MSHPX (43.28).
| GFACX | MSHPX | GFACX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 11.18 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | 3.906 | -128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 4.77M | 5,865,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.58 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | -3.85 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.63 | 3.91 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | 43.28 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...