Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs MSHPX
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs MSHPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.24
Change-$0.11 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.7B
Morgan Stanley Inst Permanence R6
Price$15.32
Change+$0.04 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5M
GFACX vs MSHPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. MSHPX commentary
Jul 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and MSHPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 326B vs. MSHPX (5.5M). MSHPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: MSHPX (2.22) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than MSHPX: GFACX (24 years) vs MSHPX (5 years). MSHPX (10.50) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). MSHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHPX: GFACX (250) vs MSHPX (5000000). MSHPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.26 vs. GFACX (10.52). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.66 vs. MSHPX (21.43).
| GFACX | MSHPX | GFACX / MSHPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 10.50 | 13% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.904 | 19.375 | 61% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326B | 5.5M | 5,928,351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.52 | 13.26 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.28 | 41.65 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.66 | 21.43 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement