Ad is loading...
GFACX vs NASDX
GFACX vs NASDX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NASDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Shelton Nasdaq-100 Index Investor
Price$34.34
Change-$1.97 (-5.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.7B
GFACX vs NASDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NASDX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and NASDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. NASDX (1.7B). NASDX pays higher dividends than GFACX: NASDX (0.32) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than NASDX: GFACX (24 years) vs NASDX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than NASDX (0.64). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NASDX (11.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NASDX: GFACX (250) vs NASDX (1000). NASDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.17 vs. GFACX (-1.75). NASDX return over 5 years is better than : 114.38 vs. GFACX (59.73).
| GFACX | NASDX | GFACX / NASDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.51 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.64 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | -6.726 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 1.7B | 16,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | -0.17 | 1,033% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.63 | 9.26 | 7% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | 114.38 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.46 | 238.80 | 19% |