Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs NASDX
GFACX vs NASDX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NASDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.76
Change-$0.81 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
Shelton Nasdaq-100 Index Investor
Price$40.14
Change-$0.52 (-1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.89B
GFACX vs NASDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NASDX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and NASDX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. NASDX (1.89B). NASDX pays higher dividends than GFACX: NASDX (0.29) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than NASDX: GFACX (24 years) vs NASDX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than NASDX (0.64). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NASDX (11.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NASDX: GFACX (250) vs NASDX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. NASDX (3.64). NASDX return over 5 years is better than : 87.04 vs. GFACX (39.11).
| GFACX | NASDX | GFACX / NASDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.51 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.64 | 213% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.705 | 4.448 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 1.89B | 16,411% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.29 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.17 | 3.64 | 142% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.73 | 63.80 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 87.04 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.69 | 269.47 | 21% |