Ad is loading...
GFACX vs NDXKX
GFACX vs NDXKX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NDXKX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.92
Change+$1.26 (+2.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.66B
Shelton Nasdaq-100 Index K
Price$33.08
Change+$0.73 (+2.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
GFACX vs NDXKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NDXKX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and NDXKX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. NDXKX (1.58B). NDXKX pays higher dividends than GFACX: NDXKX (0.10) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than NDXKX: GFACX (24 years) vs NDXKX (22 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than NDXKX (0.89). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NDXKX (11.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NDXKX: GFACX (250) vs NDXKX (1000). NDXKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.68 vs. GFACX (-5.27). NDXKX return over 5 years is better than : 66.53 vs. GFACX (28.45).
| GFACX | NDXKX | GFACX / NDXKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.77 | 177% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.89 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.136 | -13.002 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 262B | 1.58B | 16,593% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.27 | -3.68 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.96 | 13.63 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.45 | 66.53 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.91 | 189.10 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...