Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs NLCCX
GFACX vs NLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.35
Change+$0.39 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.95B
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$34.20
Change+$0.19 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets835.32M
GFACX vs NLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NLCCX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and NLCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. NLCCX (835M). GFACX (0.00) and NLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than NLCCX: GFACX (24 years) vs NLCCX (28 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: GFACX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. NLCCX (8.87). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.66 vs. NLCCX (-12.64).
| GFACX | NLCCX | GFACX / NLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.59 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.59 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.904 | 5.851 | 203% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324B | 835M | 38,802% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.52 | 8.87 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.28 | 28.00 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.66 | -12.64 | -290% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.44 | 12.17 | 529% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement