Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs NLCCX
GFACX vs NLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs NLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.18
Change-$0.44 (-0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$33.69
Change-$0.16 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets838.81M
GFACX vs NLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. NLCCX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and NLCCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NLCCX (839M). GFACX (0.00) and NLCCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than NLCCX: GFACX (24 years) vs NLCCX (28 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: GFACX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.19 vs. NLCCX (3.66). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.12 vs. NLCCX (-13.88).
| GFACX | NLCCX | GFACX / NLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.59 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.59 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.069 | 4.855 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 323B | 839M | 38,498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | 3.66 | 196% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.50 | 23.14 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.12 | -13.88 | -253% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.22 | 14.90 | 444% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement