Ad is loading...
GFACX vs PBQAX
GFACX vs PBQAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PBQAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
PGIM Jennison Blend A
Price$21.08
Change+$0.29 (+1.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets905.14M
GFACX vs PBQAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PBQAX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and PBQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. PBQAX (905M). PBQAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PBQAX (0.49) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PBQAX: GFACX (24 years) vs PBQAX (35 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PBQAX (0.93). PBQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PBQAX: GFACX (250) vs PBQAX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.10 vs. PBQAX (-13.75). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. PBQAX (25.64).
| GFACX | PBQAX | GFACX / PBQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.959 | -14.020 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 905M | 28,840% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.10 | -13.75 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.19 | -1.95 | -112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.34 | 25.64 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.37 | -3.39 | -1,043% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...