Ad is loading...
GFACX vs PGBHX
GFACX vs PGBHX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PGBHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$61.97
Change-$0.08 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
Principal Blue Chip R6
Price$46.35
Change-$0.16 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.78B
GFACX vs PGBHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PGBHX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PGBHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. PGBHX (10.8B). PGBHX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PGBHX (0.11) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PGBHX: GFACX (24 years) vs PGBHX (8 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PGBHX (0.60). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PGBHX (14.70). PGBHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PGBHX (0) vs GFACX (250). PGBHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.35 vs. GFACX (1.11). PGBHX return over 5 years is better than : 70.27 vs. GFACX (34.48).
| GFACX | PGBHX | GFACX / PGBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.57 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.60 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.807 | 0.608 | -462% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 10.8B | 2,639% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.11 | 6.35 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.22 | 58.36 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.48 | 70.27 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.30 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...