Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOCX
GFACX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.40
Change+$0.65 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.08B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$94.14
Change+$0.59 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.71B
GFACX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOCX commentary
Nov 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PNOCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 335B vs. PNOCX (6.71B). PNOCX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOCX (0.02) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOCX (22.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOCX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.97 vs. PNOCX (-5.36). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 24.50 vs. PNOCX (0.14).
| GFACX | PNOCX | GFACX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.62 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.62 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.256 | 10.506 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 335B | 6.71B | 4,995% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.97 | -5.36 | -112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.30 | 23.86 | 244% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.50 | 0.14 | 17,526% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.70 | 36.88 | 203% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement