Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOCX
GFACX vs PNOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.01
Change+$0.57 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders C
Price$91.67
Change+$0.55 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.6B
GFACX vs PNOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and PNOCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. PNOCX (6.6B). PNOCX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOCX (0.02) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOCX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNOCX (26 years). PNOCX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOCX (22.00). PNOCX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOCX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.54 vs. PNOCX (-4.73). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. PNOCX (0.79).
| GFACX | PNOCX | GFACX / PNOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.62 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.62 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.213 | 7.607 | 253% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 6.6B | 5,168% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.54 | -4.73 | -265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.39 | 32.39 | 211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | 0.79 | 4,135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.76 | 38.01 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement