Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOPX
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$127.78
Change-$0.23 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.47B
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOPX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and PNOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. PNOPX (6.47B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOPX (0.46) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOPX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOPX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.14 vs. PNOPX (0.08). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. PNOPX (18.16).
| GFACX | PNOPX | GFACX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.198 | 4.558 | 333% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 6.47B | 5,135% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | 0.08 | 19,921% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.18 | 32.38 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | 18.16 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.85 | 74.04 | 108% |