Ad is loading...
GFACX vs PNOPX
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$62.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$114.19
Change+$0.62 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.91B
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOPX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PNOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. PNOPX (5.91B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOPX (0.51) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOPX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOPX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.60 vs. PNOPX (-6.06). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.66 vs. PNOPX (27.67).
| GFACX | PNOPX | GFACX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.682 | -7.237 | 37% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 5.91B | 4,808% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.60 | -6.06 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.28 | 17.57 | 161% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.66 | 27.67 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.25 | 46.61 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers