Ad is loading...
GFACX vs PNOPX
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$67.28
Change+$0.60 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.75B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$126.91
Change+$0.56 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.66B
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOPX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PNOPX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. PNOPX (6.66B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOPX (0.15) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNOPX (34 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PNOPX (25.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOPX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.31 vs. PNOPX (14.00). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 43.12 vs. PNOPX (34.67).
| GFACX | PNOPX | GFACX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.521 | 3.659 | 151% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 6.66B | 4,655% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.31 | 14.00 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.25 | 10.98 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.12 | 34.67 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.91 | 72.34 | 92% |