Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOPX
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.94
Change+$0.24 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.05B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$126.53
Change+$0.42 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOPX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PNOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. PNOPX (6.44B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOPX (0.47) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOPX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOPX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.45 vs. PNOPX (0.28). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 38.85 vs. PNOPX (24.72).
| GFACX | PNOPX | GFACX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.829 | 3.006 | 427% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 6.44B | 5,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.45 | 0.28 | 5,490% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 31.89 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.85 | 24.72 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.89 | 62.02 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement