Ad is loading...
GFACX vs PNOPX
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$56.58
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.27B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$106.11
Change+$0.71 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.5B
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOPX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and PNOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. PNOPX (5.5B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOPX (0.51) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOPX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOPX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.76 vs. PNOPX (-9.20). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.92 vs. PNOPX (23.34).
| GFACX | PNOPX | GFACX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.261 | -13.330 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 5.5B | 4,744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.76 | -9.20 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.62 | -0.99 | -63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.92 | 23.34 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.91 | 35.80 | 92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...