Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOPX
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.76
Change-$0.81 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$120.61
Change+$0.44 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.2B
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOPX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PNOPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. PNOPX (6.2B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOPX (0.49) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOPX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOPX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. PNOPX (-6.63). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. PNOPX (28.89).
| GFACX | PNOPX | GFACX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.705 | -1.846 | -255% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 6.2B | 5,001% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.49 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.17 | -6.63 | -78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.73 | 32.90 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 28.89 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.69 | 54.78 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement