Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOPX
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOPX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders A
Price$131.23
Change+$0.81 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.52B
GFACX vs PNOPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOPX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and PNOPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. PNOPX (6.52B). PNOPX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOPX (0.44) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOPX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNOPX (35 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOPX (0.87). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOPX (22.00). PNOPX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOPX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.19 vs. PNOPX (-3.86). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.41 vs. PNOPX (16.19).
| GFACX | PNOPX | GFACX / PNOPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.87 | 156% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 35 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.033 | 6.526 | 261% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 6.52B | 5,157% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.19 | -3.86 | -238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.43 | 40.39 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.41 | 16.19 | 188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.29 | 76.48 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement