Ad is loading...
GFACX vs PNORX
GFACX vs PNORX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNORX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R
Price$100.15
Change+$1.92 (+1.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
GFACX vs PNORX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNORX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and PNORX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. PNORX (5.49B). PNORX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNORX (0.28) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNORX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNORX (22 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNORX (1.12). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNORX (22.00). PNORX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNORX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.10 vs. PNORX (-14.14). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. PNORX (22.49).
| GFACX | PNORX | GFACX / PNORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.12 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.12 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.959 | -14.292 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 5.49B | 4,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.28 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.10 | -14.14 | 50% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.19 | -3.89 | -56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.34 | 22.49 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.37 | 26.90 | 131% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers