Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNORX
GFACX vs PNORX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNORX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$67.05
Change+$0.64 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R
Price$112.35
Change+$0.85 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.16B
GFACX vs PNORX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNORX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PNORX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. PNORX (6.16B). PNORX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNORX (0.27) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNORX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNORX (22 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNORX (1.12). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNORX (22.00). PNORX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNORX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.19 vs. PNORX (-6.25). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.43 vs. PNORX (19.27).
| GFACX | PNORX | GFACX / PNORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.12 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.12 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.160 | -2.714 | -190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305B | 6.16B | 4,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.27 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | -6.25 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.50 | 16.21 | 194% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.43 | 19.27 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.69 | 45.55 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers