Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNORX
GFACX vs PNORX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNORX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.92
Change-$0.36 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R
Price$121.06
Change-$0.28 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.56B
GFACX vs PNORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNORX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and PNORX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. PNORX (6.56B). PNORX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNORX (0.25) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNORX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNORX (23 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNORX (1.12). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNORX (22.00). PNORX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNORX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.49 vs. PNORX (-1.94). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 38.41 vs. PNORX (18.51).
| GFACX | PNORX | GFACX / PNORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.12 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.12 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.503 | 5.872 | 298% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 6.56B | 5,182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.49 | -1.94 | -746% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.44 | 32.89 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.41 | 18.51 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.49 | 67.01 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers