Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOYX
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.35
Change+$0.38 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$149.97
Change+$1.02 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.51B
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOYX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and PNOYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. PNOYX (6.51B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOYX (0.57) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOYX (0.62). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.83 vs. PNOYX (-0.96). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 25.13 vs. PNOYX (21.51).
| GFACX | PNOYX | GFACX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.041 | 8.055 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 6.51B | 5,024% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.83 | -0.96 | -504% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.67 | 37.35 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.13 | 21.51 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.54 | 88.45 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement