Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOYX
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$64.58
Change-$1.08 (-1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets302.2B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$133.04
Change-$2.27 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.19B
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOYX commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PNOYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 302B vs. PNOYX (6.19B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOYX (0.68) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOYX (0.62). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.39 vs. PNOYX (-3.34). PNOYX (38.96) and GFACX (37.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFACX | PNOYX | GFACX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.286 | -2.507 | -51% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302B | 6.19B | 4,883% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.68 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.39 | -3.34 | -102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.74 | 30.03 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.11 | 38.96 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.46 | 64.69 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement