Ad is loading...
GFACX vs PNOYX
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$140.56
Change-$2.55 (-1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.5B
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOYX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and PNOYX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. PNOYX (6.5B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOYX (0.30) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. PNOYX (25.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. PNOYX (5.87). PNOYX (33.48) and GFACX (32.83) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFACX | PNOYX | GFACX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | 1.275 | 234% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 6.5B | 4,679% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | 5.87 | 173% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 18.94 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | 33.48 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | 72.87 | 76% |