Ad is loading...
GFACX vs PNOYX
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$59.39
Change+$1.47 (+2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.42B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$125.22
Change+$2.74 (+2.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOYX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PNOYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. PNOYX (5.64B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOYX (0.67) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOYX (0.62). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.45 vs. PNOYX (-6.87). GFACX (34.64) and PNOYX (33.04) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFACX | PNOYX | GFACX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.854 | -11.752 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267B | 5.64B | 4,737% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.67 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.45 | -6.87 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.37 | 5.76 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.64 | 33.04 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.05 | 49.86 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers