Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOYX
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.76
Change-$0.81 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$134.99
Change-$1.88 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.22B
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOYX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PNOYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. PNOYX (6.22B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOYX (0.65) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOYX (0.62). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. PNOYX (-5.33). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. PNOYX (35.77).
| GFACX | PNOYX | GFACX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.705 | -1.383 | -340% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 6.22B | 4,986% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.17 | -5.33 | -97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.73 | 37.98 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 35.77 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.69 | 68.13 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement