Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOYX
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.94
Change+$0.24 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.05B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$143.64
Change+$0.48 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.44B
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOYX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PNOYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. PNOYX (6.44B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOYX (0.62) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFACX (24 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOYX (0.62). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.45 vs. PNOYX (1.45). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 38.85 vs. PNOYX (30.90).
| GFACX | PNOYX | GFACX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.829 | 3.149 | 407% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 6.44B | 5,078% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.62 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.45 | 1.45 | 1,065% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | 35.58 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.85 | 30.90 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.89 | 76.19 | 89% |