Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PNOYX
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PNOYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Y
Price$150.23
Change+$0.44 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.63B
GFACX vs PNOYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PNOYX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and PNOYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. PNOYX (6.63B). PNOYX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PNOYX (0.59) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PNOYX: GFACX (25 years) vs PNOYX (31 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PNOYX (0.62). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PNOYX (22.00). PNOYX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PNOYX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. PNOYX (0.96). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.58 vs. PNOYX (29.14).
| GFACX | PNOYX | GFACX / PNOYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.62 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.460 | 8.243 | 224% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 6.63B | 5,142% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.49 | 0.96 | 1,400% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.60 | 43.13 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.58 | 29.14 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.91 | 98.83 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers