Ad is loading...
GFACX vs PSLGX
GFACX vs PSLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PSLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R6
Price$122.04
Change+$2.35 (+1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.49B
GFACX vs PSLGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PSLGX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and PSLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. PSLGX (5.49B). PSLGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PSLGX (0.75) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PSLGX: GFACX (24 years) vs PSLGX (7 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PSLGX (0.53). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PSLGX (22.00). PSLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PSLGX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.10 vs. PSLGX (-12.37). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. PSLGX (33.53).
| GFACX | PSLGX | GFACX / PSLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.53 | 257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.53 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.959 | -14.151 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 5.49B | 4,755% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.75 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.10 | -12.37 | 57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.19 | 1.01 | 217% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.34 | 33.53 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.37 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...