Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PSLGX
GFACX vs PSLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PSLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.20
Change-$0.72 (-0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.37B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R6
Price$147.43
Change-$0.77 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.53B
GFACX vs PSLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PSLGX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and PSLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. PSLGX (6.53B). PSLGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PSLGX (0.67) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PSLGX: GFACX (25 years) vs PSLGX (7 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PSLGX (0.53). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PSLGX (22.00). PSLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PSLGX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.71 vs. PSLGX (-1.50). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.51 vs. PSLGX (29.73).
| GFACX | PSLGX | GFACX / PSLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.53 | 257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.53 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.374 | 6.298 | 260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 6.53B | 5,178% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.67 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.71 | -1.50 | -717% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.29 | 46.74 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.51 | 29.73 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement