Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs PSLGX
GFACX vs PSLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs PSLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$67.05
Change+$0.64 (+0.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R6
Price$137.02
Change+$1.04 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.16B
GFACX vs PSLGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. PSLGX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and PSLGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. PSLGX (6.16B). PSLGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: PSLGX (0.71) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than PSLGX: GFACX (24 years) vs PSLGX (7 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PSLGX (0.53). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PSLGX (22.00). PSLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: PSLGX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.19 vs. PSLGX (-4.33). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.43 vs. PSLGX (30.01).
| GFACX | PSLGX | GFACX / PSLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.53 | 257% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.53 | 257% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.160 | -2.467 | -209% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305B | 6.16B | 4,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.71 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | -4.33 | -166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.50 | 22.13 | 142% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.43 | 30.01 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement