Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RBCGX
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.24
Change-$0.11 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.14B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$74.96
Change-$0.09 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.22M
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RBCGX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. RBCGX (76.2M). GFACX (0.00) and RBCGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFACX (24 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFACX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.73 vs. GFACX (11.17). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.45 vs. RBCGX (20.21).
| GFACX | RBCGX | GFACX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.01 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.01 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.731 | 11.167 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 76.2M | 426,509% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.17 | 15.73 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.76 | 56.39 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.45 | 20.21 | 180% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.53 | 18.93 | 341% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement