Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RBCGX
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.35
Change+$0.38 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$77.13
Change+$0.13 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.67M
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RBCGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and RBCGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. RBCGX (73.7M). GFACX (0.00) and RBCGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFACX (25 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFACX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.48 vs. GFACX (4.83). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 25.13 vs. RBCGX (7.06).
| GFACX | RBCGX | GFACX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.01 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.01 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.041 | 14.192 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 73.7M | 443,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.83 | 7.48 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.67 | 64.95 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.13 | 7.06 | 356% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.54 | 27.38 | 258% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement