Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RBCGX
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.11
Change+$0.47 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets301.73B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$69.32
Change+$0.52 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69M
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RBCGX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 302B vs. RBCGX (69M). GFACX (0.00) and RBCGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFACX (24 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFACX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.33 vs. GFACX (7.65). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.81 vs. RBCGX (20.72).
| GFACX | RBCGX | GFACX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.01 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.01 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.686 | 2.032 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 302B | 69M | 437,681% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.65 | 11.33 | 68% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.38 | 36.86 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.81 | 20.72 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.28 | 12.38 | 438% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers