Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RBCGX
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.44
Change-$0.49 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$79.53
Change-$0.38 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets77.55M
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RBCGX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and RBCGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. RBCGX (77.6M). GFACX (0.00) and RBCGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFACX (25 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFACX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.91 vs. GFACX (12.87). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 33.31 vs. RBCGX (12.96).
| GFACX | RBCGX | GFACX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.01 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.01 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.319 | 18.508 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 77.6M | 442,010% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.87 | 19.91 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.12 | 78.97 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.31 | 12.96 | 257% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.37 | 36.27 | 230% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement