Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RBCGX
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RBCGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.57
Change+$0.99 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.88B
Reynolds Blue Chip Growth
Price$76.90
Change+$0.97 (+1.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.4M
GFACX vs RBCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RBCGX commentary
Aug 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and RBCGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. RBCGX (75.4M). GFACX (0.00) and RBCGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RBCGX: GFACX (24 years) vs RBCGX (37 years). RBCGX (2.01) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). RBCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 269.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBCGX: GFACX (250) vs RBCGX (1000). RBCGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.29 vs. GFACX (17.24). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.49 vs. RBCGX (15.12).
| GFACX | RBCGX | GFACX / RBCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.01 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.01 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.817 | 12.606 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 75.4M | 431,034% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.24 | 24.29 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.74 | 44.19 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.49 | 15.12 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.24 | 22.11 | 313% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement