Ad is loading...
GFACX vs RGEBX
GFACX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RGEBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$64.09
Change-$3.82 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
GFACX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RGEBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX (280B) and RGEBX (280B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . GFACX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: GFACX (24 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). GFACX (25.00) and RGEBX (25.00) have comparable annual turnover. GFACX (250) and RGEBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.53 vs. GFACX (-1.75). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 66.95 vs. GFACX (59.73).
| GFACX | RGEBX | GFACX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.09 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.09 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | -4.941 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 280B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | -0.53 | 332% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.63 | 3.55 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | 66.95 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.46 | 53.92 | 82% |