Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RMBGX
GFACX vs RMBGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RMBGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.53
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
GFACX vs RMBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RMBGX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and RMBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. RMBGX (116M). RMBGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: RMBGX (0.10) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than RMBGX: GFACX (24 years) vs RMBGX (9 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMBGX (0.99). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMBGX (10.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBGX: GFACX (250) vs RMBGX (100000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. RMBGX (3.66). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.56 vs. RMBGX (31.85).
| GFACX | RMBGX | GFACX / RMBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.755 | 6.100 | 225% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 116M | 283,621% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.43 | 3.66 | 339% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.41 | 6.74 | 540% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.56 | 31.85 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 68.60 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement