Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RMBGX
GFACX vs RMBGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RMBGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.83
Change+$0.34 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.88B
GFACX vs RMBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RMBGX commentary
Oct 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and RMBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 337B vs. RMBGX (115M). RMBGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: RMBGX (0.10) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than RMBGX: GFACX (25 years) vs RMBGX (9 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMBGX (0.99). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMBGX (10.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBGX: GFACX (250) vs RMBGX (100000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.95 vs. RMBGX (0.96). GFACX (35.26) and RMBGX (34.25) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFACX | RMBGX | GFACX / RMBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.829 | 7.269 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 337B | 115M | 293,043% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.95 | 0.96 | 1,144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.32 | 30.80 | 219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.26 | 34.25 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.81 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement