Ad is loading...
GFACX vs RMBGX
GFACX vs RMBGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RMBGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$53.23
Change-$0.77 (-1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets248.76B
GFACX vs RMBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RMBGX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and RMBGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 249B vs. RMBGX (94.9M). RMBGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: RMBGX (0.11) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than RMBGX: GFACX (24 years) vs RMBGX (8 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMBGX (0.99). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMBGX (8.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBGX: GFACX (250) vs RMBGX (100000). RMBGX (-13.41) and GFACX (-13.80) have marching annual gain over last year. RMBGX (27.90) and GFACX (27.34) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFACX | RMBGX | GFACX / RMBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.515 | -14.139 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 249B | 94.9M | 262,381% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.80 | -13.41 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.38 | -14.04 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.34 | 27.90 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers