Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RMBGX
GFACX vs RMBGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RMBGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$64.81
Change+$0.23 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.16B
GFACX vs RMBGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RMBGX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and RMBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 297B vs. RMBGX (110M). RMBGX pays higher dividends than GFACX: RMBGX (0.11) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than RMBGX: GFACX (24 years) vs RMBGX (8 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMBGX (0.99). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMBGX (10.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBGX: GFACX (250) vs RMBGX (100000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. RMBGX (-4.21). GFACX (37.60) and RMBGX (37.32) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFACX | RMBGX | GFACX / RMBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.647 | -2.281 | -72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297B | 110M | 270,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -4.21 | -101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.55 | 9.05 | 371% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.60 | 37.32 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.99 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers