Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RMBHX
GFACX vs RMBHX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RMBHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.41
Change-$0.22 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.91B
GFACX vs RMBHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RMBHX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and RMBHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. RMBHX (111M). GFACX (0.00) and RMBHX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RMBHX: GFACX (24 years) vs RMBHX (50 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMBHX (1.24). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMBHX (10.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBHX: GFACX (250) vs RMBHX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.51 vs. RMBHX (-2.01). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.58 vs. RMBHX (26.60).
| GFACX | RMBHX | GFACX / RMBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 50 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.501 | -1.099 | -410% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 111M | 275,676% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | -2.01 | -324% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.78 | 4.63 | 686% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.58 | 26.60 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.81 | -13.82 | -411% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement