Ad is loading...
GFACX vs RMBHX
GFACX vs RMBHX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RMBHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
GFACX vs RMBHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RMBHX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and RMBHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. RMBHX (113M). RMBHX pays higher dividends than GFACX: RMBHX (0.00) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than RMBHX: GFACX (24 years) vs RMBHX (50 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RMBHX (8.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBHX: GFACX (250) vs RMBHX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. RMBHX (1.57). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.83 vs. RMBHX (20.43).
| GFACX | RMBHX | GFACX / RMBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 50 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | 0.867 | 344% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 113M | 269,027% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | 1.57 | 646% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 2.18 | 811% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | 20.43 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | -12.57 | -443% |