Ad is loading...
GFACX vs RMBHX
GFACX vs RMBHX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RMBHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$59.96
Change+$0.40 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.25B
GFACX vs RMBHX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RMBHX commentary
Apr 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and RMBHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 275B vs. RMBHX (105M). GFACX (0.00) and RMBHX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RMBHX: GFACX (24 years) vs RMBHX (50 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMBHX (1.24). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMBHX (8.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBHX: GFACX (250) vs RMBHX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.96 vs. RMBHX (-5.77). RMBHX (56.13) and GFACX (55.98) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFACX | RMBHX | GFACX / RMBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 50 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.960 | -5.580 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 275B | 105M | 261,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.96 | -5.77 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.28 | -7.88 | -16% |
| Returns for 5 years | 55.98 | 56.13 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.82 | -16.92 | -259% |