Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RMBHX
GFACX vs RMBHX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RMBHX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.89
Change-$0.79 (-1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets326.06B
GFACX vs RMBHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RMBHX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and RMBHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 326B vs. RMBHX (114M). GFACX (0.00) and RMBHX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RMBHX: GFACX (24 years) vs RMBHX (50 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RMBHX (1.24). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RMBHX (10.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RMBHX: GFACX (250) vs RMBHX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.98 vs. RMBHX (6.85). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.89 vs. RMBHX (29.10).
| GFACX | RMBHX | GFACX / RMBHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 50 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.183 | 4.134 | 270% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 326B | 114M | 285,965% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.98 | 6.85 | 277% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.40 | 7.63 | 503% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.89 | 29.10 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.37 | -12.08 | -549% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers