Ad is loading...
GFACX vs RRGSX
GFACX vs RRGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RRGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.90
Change+$0.75 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.54B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock R
Price$96.00
Change+$0.96 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.64B
GFACX vs RRGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RRGSX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and RRGSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. RRGSX (51.6B). GFACX (0.00) and RRGSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RRGSX: GFACX (24 years) vs RRGSX (22 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. RRGSX (28.90). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRGSX: GFACX (250) vs RRGSX (2500). GFACX (19.88) and RRGSX (19.60) have marching annual gain over last year. GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.07 vs. RRGSX (32.34).
| GFACX | RRGSX | GFACX / RRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.356 | 0.904 | 371% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307B | 51.6B | 595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.88 | 19.60 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.80 | 8.70 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.07 | 32.34 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.62 | 94.77 | 69% |