Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs RRGSX
GFACX vs RRGSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs RRGSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$69.20
Change+$0.71 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.68B
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock R
Price$98.68
Change+$0.88 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.71B
GFACX vs RRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. RRGSX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and RRGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 314B vs. RRGSX (49.7B). GFACX (0.00) and RRGSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than RRGSX: GFACX (24 years) vs RRGSX (23 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than RRGSX (1.16). RRGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.20 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RRGSX: GFACX (250) vs RRGSX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. RRGSX (2.16). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. RRGSX (34.54).
| GFACX | RRGSX | GFACX / RRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.16 | 117% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.16 | 117% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.532 | 2.796 | 305% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 314B | 49.7B | 632% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | 2.16 | 363% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.29 | 49.45 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 34.54 | 125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.72 | 83.87 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement