Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBRAX
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBRAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.76
Change-$0.81 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Ret
Price$19.42
Change-$0.24 (-1.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.05M
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBRAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and SBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. SBRAX (92.1M). SBRAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBRAX (0.21) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: GFACX (24 years) vs SBRAX (6 years). SBRAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: GFACX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. SBRAX (-11.27). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. SBRAX (16.44).
| GFACX | SBRAX | GFACX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.56 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.705 | -0.410 | -1,147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 92.1M | 332,248% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.21 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.17 | -11.27 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.73 | 3.37 | 1,386% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 16.44 | 238% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.69 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement