Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBRAX
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBRAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.77
Change+$0.15 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Ret
Price$20.65
Change+$0.09 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.4M
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBRAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and SBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. SBRAX (85.4M). SBRAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBRAX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBRAX (6 years). SBRAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: GFACX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.19 vs. SBRAX (-11.92). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 30.41 vs. SBRAX (4.57).
| GFACX | SBRAX | GFACX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.56 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.033 | 5.436 | 313% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 85.4M | 393,443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.19 | -11.92 | -77% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.43 | 9.04 | 713% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.41 | 4.57 | 665% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement