Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBRAX
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBRAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.35
Change+$0.38 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Ret
Price$20.58
Change+$0.10 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets83.3M
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBRAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and SBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. SBRAX (83.3M). SBRAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBRAX (0.19) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBRAX (6 years). SBRAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: GFACX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.83 vs. SBRAX (-13.08). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 25.13 vs. SBRAX (1.52).
| GFACX | SBRAX | GFACX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.56 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.041 | 5.026 | 299% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 83.3M | 392,557% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.19 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.83 | -13.08 | -37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.67 | 3.30 | 1,685% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.13 | 1.52 | 1,658% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.54 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement