Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SBRAX
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SBRAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Segall Bryant & Hamill All Cap Ret
Price$20.56
Change+$0.17 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.69M
GFACX vs SBRAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SBRAX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and SBRAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. SBRAX (92.7M). SBRAX pays higher dividends than GFACX: SBRAX (0.20) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than SBRAX: GFACX (25 years) vs SBRAX (6 years). SBRAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). SBRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBRAX: GFACX (250) vs SBRAX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.14 vs. SBRAX (-8.76). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. SBRAX (9.33).
| GFACX | SBRAX | GFACX / SBRAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.99 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.56 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.198 | 4.974 | 306% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 92.7M | 358,145% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.20 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | -8.76 | -184% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.18 | 4.87 | 1,091% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | 9.33 | 351% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement