Ad is loading...
GFACX vs SLGCX
GFACX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$60.11
Change+$0.72 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets277.5B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$4.78
Change+$0.07 (+1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.41M
GFACX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SLGCX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 277B vs. SLGCX (33.4M). GFACX (0.00) and SLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: GFACX (24 years) vs SLGCX (26 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.38 vs. SLGCX (-48.93). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.27 vs. SLGCX (-62.92).
| GFACX | SLGCX | GFACX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.67 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.67 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.725 | -7.184 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 277B | 33.4M | 829,341% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.38 | -48.93 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.35 | -54.08 | -28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.27 | -62.92 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.89 | -79.56 | -50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...