Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SLGCX
GFACX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$5.91
Change+$0.02 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.04M
GFACX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SLGCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. SLGCX (40M). GFACX (0.00) and SLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: GFACX (25 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.14 vs. SLGCX (-41.89). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. SLGCX (-63.31).
| GFACX | SLGCX | GFACX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.67 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.67 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.198 | 14.757 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 40M | 830,000% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | -41.89 | -39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.18 | -39.69 | -134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | -63.31 | -52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.85 | -73.33 | -109% |