Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SLGCX
GFACX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.53
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.24B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$6.13
Change-$0.05 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.56M
GFACX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SLGCX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. SLGCX (41.6M). GFACX (0.00) and SLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: GFACX (25 years) vs SLGCX (27 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. SLGCX (-43.24). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.58 vs. SLGCX (-61.42).
| GFACX | SLGCX | GFACX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.67 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.67 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.460 | 19.029 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 41.6M | 819,712% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.49 | -43.24 | -31% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.60 | -35.68 | -170% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.58 | -61.42 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.91 | -72.77 | -119% |