Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs SLGCX
GFACX vs SLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs SLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$64.81
Change+$0.23 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets297.16B
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth C
Price$5.24
Change+$0.02 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.33M
GFACX vs SLGCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. SLGCX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and SLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 297B vs. SLGCX (36.3M). GFACX (0.00) and SLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than SLGCX: GFACX (24 years) vs SLGCX (26 years). SLGCX (2.67) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). SLGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX (250) and SLGCX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.25 vs. SLGCX (-48.06). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.60 vs. SLGCX (-62.04).
| GFACX | SLGCX | GFACX / SLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.67 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 2.67 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.647 | 1.359 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 297B | 36.3M | 818,182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | -48.06 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.55 | -44.88 | -75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.60 | -62.04 | -61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.99 | -77.60 | -64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement