Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBCIX
GFACX vs TBCIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBCIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.92
Change-$0.36 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth I
Price$215.69
Change-$0.75 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets69.07B
GFACX vs TBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBCIX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and TBCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. TBCIX (69.1B). GFACX (0.00) and TBCIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBCIX: GFACX (25 years) vs TBCIX (10 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBCIX (0.57). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TBCIX (15.70). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBCIX: GFACX (250) vs TBCIX (500000). TBCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.31 vs. GFACX (14.49). TBCIX return over 5 years is better than : 45.31 vs. GFACX (38.41).
| GFACX | TBCIX | GFACX / TBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.57 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.57 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.503 | 15.502 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 69.1B | 492% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.49 | 15.31 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.44 | 78.82 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.41 | 45.31 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.49 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement