Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBCIX
GFACX vs TBCIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBCIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.35
Change+$0.39 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.95B
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth I
Price$205.25
Change+$0.77 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.46B
GFACX vs TBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBCIX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TBCIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. TBCIX (65.5B). GFACX (0.00) and TBCIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBCIX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBCIX (10 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBCIX (0.57). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TBCIX (15.70). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBCIX: GFACX (250) vs TBCIX (500000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.52 vs. TBCIX (9.44). TBCIX return over 5 years is better than : 41.27 vs. GFACX (36.66).
| GFACX | TBCIX | GFACX / TBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.57 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.57 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.904 | 9.120 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324B | 65.5B | 495% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.52 | 9.44 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.28 | 70.13 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.66 | 41.27 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement