Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBCIX
GFACX vs TBCIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBCIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.13
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets320.87B
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth I
Price$201.57
Change-$0.59 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.06B
GFACX vs TBCIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBCIX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TBCIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 321B vs. TBCIX (65.1B). GFACX (0.00) and TBCIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBCIX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBCIX (10 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBCIX (0.57). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. TBCIX (15.70). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBCIX: GFACX (250) vs TBCIX (500000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.12 vs. TBCIX (4.30). TBCIX return over 5 years is better than : 38.40 vs. GFACX (34.84).
| GFACX | TBCIX | GFACX / TBCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.57 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.57 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.991 | 7.882 | 127% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 321B | 65.1B | 493% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.12 | 4.30 | 165% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.39 | 62.80 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.84 | 38.40 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement