Ad is loading...
GFACX vs TBDAX
GFACX vs TBDAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$60.11
Change+$0.72 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets274.2B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth A
Price$17.37
Change+$0.24 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets321.08M
GFACX vs TBDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDAX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TBDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 274B vs. TBDAX (321M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDAX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBDAX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBDAX (0.93). TBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDAX: GFACX (250) vs TBDAX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.38 vs. TBDAX (-3.93). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.27 vs. TBDAX (28.70).
| GFACX | TBDAX | GFACX / TBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.82 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.725 | -8.931 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274B | 321M | 85,358% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.38 | -3.93 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.35 | 33.41 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.27 | 28.70 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.89 | 45.02 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...