Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBDAX
GFACX vs TBDAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.76
Change-$0.81 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth A
Price$19.34
Change-$0.27 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets373.34M
GFACX vs TBDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TBDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. TBDAX (373M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDAX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBDAX (26 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBDAX (0.93). TBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDAX: GFACX (250) vs TBDAX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.17 vs. TBDAX (-3.06). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. TBDAX (30.85).
| GFACX | TBDAX | GFACX / TBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.82 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.705 | 2.818 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 373M | 82,038% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.17 | -3.06 | -169% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.73 | 73.14 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | 30.85 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.69 | 64.28 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement