Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBDAX
GFACX vs TBDAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.97
Change-$0.51 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth A
Price$21.46
Change-$0.27 (-1.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets428.48M
GFACX vs TBDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and TBDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. TBDAX (428M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDAX: GFACX (25 years) vs TBDAX (26 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBDAX (0.91). TBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDAX: GFACX (250) vs TBDAX (1000). TBDAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.49 vs. GFACX (5.07). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 24.08 vs. TBDAX (17.21).
| GFACX | TBDAX | GFACX / TBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.80 | 170% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.91 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.445 | 15.524 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 428M | 77,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | 5.49 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.86 | 85.09 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.08 | 17.21 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.66 | 83.81 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers