Ad is loading...
GFACX vs TBDAX
GFACX vs TBDAX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth A
Price$16.35
Change-$0.99 (-5.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.54M
GFACX vs TBDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDAX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and TBDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. TBDAX (319M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDAX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDAX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBDAX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBDAX (0.93). TBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDAX: GFACX (250) vs TBDAX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.75 vs. TBDAX (-7.57). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. TBDAX (52.51).
| GFACX | TBDAX | GFACX / TBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.82 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.93 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | -7.815 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 319M | 87,774% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | -7.57 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.63 | 16.53 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | 52.51 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.46 | 49.19 | 90% |