Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBDCX
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$66.95
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.93B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$12.00
Change-$0.04 (-0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets373.37M
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDCX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. TBDCX (373M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFACX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.48 vs. TBDCX (-11.63). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.98 vs. TBDCX (-1.88).
| GFACX | TBDCX | GFACX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.90 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.96 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.003 | 2.215 | 226% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307B | 373M | 82,306% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.48 | -11.63 | -38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.24 | 57.89 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.98 | -1.88 | -1,860% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.94 | 15.27 | 360% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers