Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBDCX
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$74.70
Change-$0.13 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.91B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$13.26
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets425.54M
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDCX commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. TBDCX (426M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFACX (25 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFACX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.58 vs. TBDCX (0.45). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 39.11 vs. TBDCX (-3.14).
| GFACX | TBDCX | GFACX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.90 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.96 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.158 | 12.947 | 133% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 426M | 78,873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.58 | 0.45 | 3,428% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.17 | 60.14 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.11 | -3.14 | -1,245% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.02 | 35.86 | 229% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement