Ad is loading...
GFACX vs TBDCX
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$62.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$11.16
Change+$0.06 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets344.66M
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. TBDCX (345M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFACX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.60 vs. TBDCX (-10.63). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.66 vs. TBDCX (-1.07).
| GFACX | TBDCX | GFACX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.90 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.96 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.682 | -5.451 | 49% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 345M | 82,319% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.60 | -10.63 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.28 | 35.53 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.66 | -1.07 | -3,240% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.25 | 7.14 | 633% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...