Ad is loading...
GFACX vs TBDCX
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$56.58
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$10.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.29M
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. TBDCX (299M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBDCX (25 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFACX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.76 vs. TBDCX (-16.46). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.92 vs. TBDCX (-5.78).
| GFACX | TBDCX | GFACX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.90 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.96 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.261 | -13.969 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 299M | 87,291% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.76 | -16.46 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.62 | 7.10 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.92 | -5.78 | -483% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.91 | -2.13 | -1,544% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...