Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBDCX
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.59
Change+$1.38 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.96B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$12.83
Change+$0.20 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets413.12M
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDCX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and TBDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. TBDCX (413M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBDCX (26 years). TBDCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFACX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.39 vs. TBDCX (-2.58). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.27 vs. TBDCX (-10.34).
| GFACX | TBDCX | GFACX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.90 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.96 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.849 | 9.284 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 413M | 79,661% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.39 | -2.58 | -480% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.40 | 46.46 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.27 | -10.34 | -312% |
| Returns for 10 years | 87.43 | 39.00 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement