Ad is loading...
GFACX vs TBDCX
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.90
Change+$0.75 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.54B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth C
Price$11.94
Change+$0.14 (+1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets360.26M
GFACX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TBDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 307B vs. TBDCX (360M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBDCX (25 years). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 156.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: GFACX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.88 vs. TBDCX (6.80). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 36.07 vs. TBDCX (1.96).
| GFACX | TBDCX | GFACX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.356 | 1.704 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307B | 360M | 85,278% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.88 | 6.80 | 292% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.80 | 14.48 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.07 | 1.96 | 1,837% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.62 | 21.34 | 307% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...