Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBDQX
GFACX vs TBDQX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDQX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.31
Change-$0.56 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.05B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth R6
Price$22.64
Change-$0.12 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439.03M
GFACX vs TBDQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDQX commentary
Dec 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TBDQX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. TBDQX (439M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDQX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDQX: GFACX (25 years) vs TBDQX (8 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBDQX (0.84). TBDQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). TBDQX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: TBDQX (0) vs GFACX (250). TBDQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.86 vs. GFACX (5.55). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 23.66 vs. TBDQX (18.79).
| GFACX | TBDQX | GFACX / TBDQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.44 | 309% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.84 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.115 | 18.975 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 439M | 77,449% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.55 | 5.86 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.70 | 85.80 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.66 | 18.79 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.33 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement