Ad is loading...
GFACX vs TBDZX
GFACX vs TBDZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Z
Price$19.49
Change-$0.47 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets355.86M
GFACX vs TBDZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDZX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and TBDZX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. TBDZX (356M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDZX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDZX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBDZX (7 years). TBDZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 156.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). TBDZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: TBDZX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. TBDZX (4.34). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.83 vs. TBDZX (28.82).
| GFACX | TBDZX | GFACX / TBDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | 1.988 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 356M | 85,393% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | 4.34 | 234% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 39.51 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | 28.82 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | N/A | - |