Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs TBDZX
GFACX vs TBDZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.96
Change+$0.29 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.95B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Z
Price$20.61
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets397.22M
GFACX vs TBDZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDZX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TBDZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. TBDZX (397M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDZX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDZX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBDZX (8 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBDZX (0.78). TBDZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). TBDZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: TBDZX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.11 vs. TBDZX (-1.01). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.91 vs. TBDZX (24.26).
| GFACX | TBDZX | GFACX / TBDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.78 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.292 | 7.745 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324B | 397M | 81,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | -1.01 | -704% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.01 | 72.88 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.91 | 24.26 | 148% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.31 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement