Ad is loading...
GFACX vs TBDZX
GFACX vs TBDZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$62.05
Change+$0.45 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Z
Price$18.24
Change+$0.10 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets344.66M
GFACX vs TBDZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDZX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and TBDZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. TBDZX (345M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDZX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDZX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBDZX (8 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBDZX (0.78). TBDZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). TBDZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: TBDZX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.60 vs. TBDZX (-2.77). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.66 vs. TBDZX (29.09).
| GFACX | TBDZX | GFACX / TBDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.78 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.682 | -4.553 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 345M | 82,319% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.60 | -2.77 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.28 | 51.37 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.66 | 29.09 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...