Ad is loading...
GFACX vs TBDZX
GFACX vs TBDZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TBDZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$56.58
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
PGIM Jennison Diversified Growth Z
Price$16.50
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.29M
GFACX vs TBDZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TBDZX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and TBDZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. TBDZX (299M). GFACX (0.00) and TBDZX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TBDZX: GFACX (24 years) vs TBDZX (8 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TBDZX (0.78). TBDZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 147.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). TBDZX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: TBDZX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.76 vs. TBDZX (-9.64). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.92 vs. TBDZX (22.15).
| GFACX | TBDZX | GFACX / TBDZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.78 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.261 | -13.710 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 299M | 87,291% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.76 | -9.64 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.62 | 18.89 | 3% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.92 | 22.15 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.91 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...