Ad is loading...
GFACX vs TGWFX
GFACX vs TGWFX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs TGWFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.41
Change+$0.90 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
Transamerica Large Growth R4
Price$11.40
Change+$0.16 (+1.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets290.6M
GFACX vs TGWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. TGWFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and TGWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. TGWFX (291M). GFACX (0.00) and TGWFX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than TGWFX: GFACX (24 years) vs TGWFX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than TGWFX (0.96). TGWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than TGWFX: GFACX (250) vs TGWFX (5000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.10 vs. TGWFX (-10.86). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.34 vs. TGWFX (2.37).
| GFACX | TGWFX | GFACX / TGWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.90 | 151% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.96 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.959 | -14.590 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000 | 5% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 291M | 89,691% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.10 | -10.86 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.19 | -4.18 | -52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.34 | 2.37 | 1,577% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.37 | 26.60 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...