Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs URLGX
GFACX vs URLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs URLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.94
Change+$0.24 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth R
Price$3.66
Change+$0.02 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets711.48M
GFACX vs URLGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. URLGX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and URLGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. URLGX (711M). GFACX (0.00) and URLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than URLGX: GFACX (24 years) vs URLGX (21 years). URLGX (1.44) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). URLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. GFACX (25.00). URLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: URLGX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.45 vs. URLGX (-27.49). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 38.85 vs. URLGX (-68.10).
| GFACX | URLGX | GFACX / URLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.30 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.44 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.829 | -25.410 | -50% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 711M | 46,132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.45 | -27.49 | -56% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.55 | -24.64 | -209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.85 | -68.10 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.89 | -79.48 | -85% |