Ad is loading...
GFACX vs URLGX
GFACX vs URLGX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs URLGX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Columbia Select Large Cap Growth R
Price$4.87
Change-$0.11 (-2.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets790.53M
GFACX vs URLGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. URLGX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and URLGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. URLGX (791M). GFACX (0.00) and URLGX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than URLGX: GFACX (24 years) vs URLGX (20 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. URLGX (26.00). URLGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: URLGX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.15 vs. URLGX (-17.88). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.83 vs. URLGX (-58.16).
| GFACX | URLGX | GFACX / URLGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | -0.205 | -1,454% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 791M | 38,432% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | -17.88 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | -30.92 | -57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | -58.16 | -56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | -72.73 | -76% |