Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WLGCX
GFACX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.44
Change-$0.49 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund C
Price$26.33
Change-$0.10 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.07B
GFACX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WLGCX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. WLGCX (8.07B). GFACX (0.00) and WLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: GFACX (25 years) vs WLGCX (25 years). WLGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: GFACX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.87 vs. WLGCX (10.91). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 33.31 vs. WLGCX (18.15).
| GFACX | WLGCX | GFACX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.64 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.74 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.319 | 8.676 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 8.07B | 4,250% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.87 | 10.91 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.12 | 49.91 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.31 | 18.15 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.37 | 60.47 | 138% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement