Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WLGCX
GFACX vs WLGCX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WLGCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.89
Change+$0.12 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund C
Price$25.89
Change+$0.08 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.03B
GFACX vs WLGCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WLGCX commentary
Aug 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and WLGCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WLGCX (8.03B). GFACX (0.00) and WLGCX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WLGCX: GFACX (24 years) vs WLGCX (25 years). WLGCX (1.74) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGCX (18.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WLGCX: GFACX (250) vs WLGCX (1000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.95 vs. WLGCX (8.37). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.88 vs. WLGCX (11.64).
| GFACX | WLGCX | GFACX / WLGCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.64 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.74 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.319 | 6.456 | 222% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 8.03B | 4,084% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.95 | 8.37 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.01 | 30.30 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.88 | 11.64 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.96 | 57.19 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement