Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WLGRX
GFACX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.52
Change+$0.27 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.04B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$35.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8B
GFACX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WLGRX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. WLGRX (8B). GFACX (0.00) and WLGRX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: GFACX (24 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WLGRX (1.24). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: WLGRX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. WLGRX (10.13). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 31.04 vs. WLGRX (27.95).
| GFACX | WLGRX | GFACX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.14 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.739 | 5.197 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 8B | 4,115% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 10.13 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.55 | 43.06 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.04 | 27.95 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.80 | 96.30 | 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement