Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WLGRX
GFACX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$71.38
Change-$0.14 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$35.27
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.12B
GFACX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WLGRX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and WLGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. WLGRX (8.12B). GFACX (0.00) and WLGRX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: GFACX (24 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WLGRX (1.24). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: WLGRX (0) vs GFACX (250). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.28 vs. WLGRX (17.29). WLGRX (33.04) and GFACX (32.87) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFACX | WLGRX | GFACX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.14 | 119% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.24 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.951 | 5.948 | 201% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 8.12B | 4,003% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.28 | 17.29 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.98 | 33.14 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.87 | 33.04 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.31 | 82.65 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers