Ad is loading...
GFACX vs WPSZX
GFACX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$49.44
Change-$1.89 (-3.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets723.78M
GFACX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WPSZX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and WPSZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. WPSZX (724M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than GFACX: WPSZX (0.16) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: GFACX (24 years) vs WPSZX (11 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.72). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: GFACX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.75 vs. WPSZX (-8.51). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 59.73 vs. WPSZX (55.30).
| GFACX | WPSZX | GFACX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | -3.224 | 155% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 724M | 38,674% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | -8.51 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.63 | -3.45 | -18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | 55.30 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.46 | 81.82 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...