Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WPSZX
GFACX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.66
Change-$0.68 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$56.93
Change-$0.21 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets731.47M
GFACX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WPSZX commentary
Sep 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. WPSZX (731M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than GFACX: WPSZX (0.15) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: GFACX (24 years) vs WPSZX (12 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.72). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: GFACX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.25 vs. WPSZX (-2.10). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 27.47 vs. WPSZX (19.31).
| GFACX | WPSZX | GFACX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.959 | 7.334 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 731M | 44,870% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.25 | -2.10 | -583% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.26 | 23.15 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.47 | 19.31 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.02 | 112.11 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement