Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WPSZX
GFACX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.96
Change+$0.29 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets323.95B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$55.55
Change+$0.15 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets731.51M
GFACX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WPSZX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. WPSZX (732M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than GFACX: WPSZX (0.15) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: GFACX (24 years) vs WPSZX (11 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.72). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: GFACX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.11 vs. WPSZX (-4.34). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 35.91 vs. WPSZX (26.06).
| GFACX | WPSZX | GFACX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.292 | 4.449 | 254% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324B | 732M | 44,262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | -4.34 | -164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.01 | 23.45 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.91 | 26.06 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.31 | 90.73 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement