Ad is loading...
GFACX vs WPSZX
GFACX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$60.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.67B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$51.65
Change+$0.24 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets696.26M
GFACX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WPSZX commentary
May 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. WPSZX (696M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than GFACX: WPSZX (0.16) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: GFACX (24 years) vs WPSZX (11 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.72). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: GFACX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.66 vs. WPSZX (-4.01). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.87 vs. WPSZX (31.33).
| GFACX | WPSZX | GFACX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.925 | -3.073 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 696M | 40,230% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.16 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.66 | -4.01 | -66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.12 | 6.48 | 264% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.87 | 31.33 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.70 | 81.53 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...