Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs WPSZX
GFACX vs WPSZX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs WPSZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$69.20
Change+$0.71 (+1.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.68B
AB Concentrated Growth Z
Price$55.24
Change+$0.12 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets731.77M
GFACX vs WPSZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. WPSZX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and WPSZX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 314B vs. WPSZX (732M). WPSZX pays higher dividends than GFACX: WPSZX (0.15) vs GFACX (0.00). GFACX was incepted earlier than WPSZX: GFACX (24 years) vs WPSZX (11 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than WPSZX (0.72). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WPSZX (11.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than WPSZX: GFACX (250) vs WPSZX (2000000). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.84 vs. WPSZX (-2.36). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 43.09 vs. WPSZX (35.54).
| GFACX | WPSZX | GFACX / WPSZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.72 | 189% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.532 | 3.922 | 218% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 314B | 732M | 42,896% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.15 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.84 | -2.36 | -331% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.29 | 20.55 | 220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.09 | 35.54 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.72 | 94.76 | 68% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement