Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs ZVGNX
GFACX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.45
Change+$0.17 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$57.37
Change+$0.47 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.38M
GFACX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and ZVGNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. ZVGNX (76.4M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVGNX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: GFACX (25 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGNX (18.83). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: GFACX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). ZVGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 45.24 vs. GFACX (16.14). ZVGNX return over 5 years is better than : 46.65 vs. GFACX (32.72).
| GFACX | ZVGNX | GFACX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.30 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.62 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.198 | 16.558 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 332B | 76.4M | 434,555% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.14 | 45.24 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.18 | 114.95 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | 46.65 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.85 | 484.81 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement