Ad is loading...
GFACX vs ZVGNX
GFACX vs ZVGNX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVGNX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$59.59
Change-$2.22 (-3.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets286.57B
Zevenbergen Genea Investor
Price$43.87
Change+$0.02 (+0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets63.95M
GFACX vs ZVGNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVGNX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and ZVGNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 287B vs. ZVGNX (63.9M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVGNX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVGNX: GFACX (24 years) vs ZVGNX (10 years). ZVGNX (1.62) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVGNX (18.83). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVGNX: GFACX (250) vs ZVGNX (2500). ZVGNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.50 vs. GFACX (1.20). ZVGNX return over 5 years is better than : 86.52 vs. GFACX (39.34).
| GFACX | ZVGNX | GFACX / ZVGNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.30 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.62 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.058 | -10.870 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 287B | 63.9M | 449,139% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.20 | 10.50 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.98 | 28.50 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.34 | 86.52 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.24 | N/A | - |