Ad is loading...
GFACX vs ZVNBX
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$64.46
Change+$0.58 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$38.98
Change+$0.43 (+1.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 301B vs. ZVNBX (141M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVNBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFACX (24 years) vs ZVNBX (9 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. ZVNBX (21.85). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFACX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.59 vs. GFACX (17.61). ZVNBX return over 5 years is better than : 103.23 vs. GFACX (38.27).
| GFACX | ZVNBX | GFACX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.200 | 38.178 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 301B | 141M | 213,475% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.61 | 37.59 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.26 | 3.09 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.27 | 103.23 | 37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.73 | N/A | - |