Ad is loading...
GFACX vs ZVNBX
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$67.56
Change+$0.44 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets312.2B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$40.11
Change+$0.13 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.69M
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Jan 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 312B vs. ZVNBX (143M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVNBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFACX (24 years) vs ZVNBX (9 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. ZVNBX (21.85). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFACX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 37.08 vs. GFACX (20.36). ZVNBX return over 5 years is better than : 90.37 vs. GFACX (40.63).
| GFACX | ZVNBX | GFACX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.960 | 6.027 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 312B | 143M | 218,182% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.36 | 37.08 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.20 | 35.42 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.63 | 90.37 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...