Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs ZVNBX
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$76.01
Change+$0.57 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$44.35
Change+$1.00 (+2.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.71M
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. ZVNBX (137M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVNBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFACX (25 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFACX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.96 vs. GFACX (12.54). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. ZVNBX (15.26).
| GFACX | ZVNBX | GFACX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.30 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.52 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.213 | 14.592 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 137M | 248,905% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.54 | 23.96 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 68.39 | 123.22 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.77 | 15.26 | 215% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.76 | 340.55 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers