Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs ZVNBX
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$73.34
Change+$0.45 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.53B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$42.57
Change+$0.55 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.21M
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Aug 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Buy and ZVNBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. ZVNBX (143M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVNBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFACX (24 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (13.62). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFACX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.29 vs. GFACX (13.55). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 28.67 vs. ZVNBX (22.79).
| GFACX | ZVNBX | GFACX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.30 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.52 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.025 | 11.076 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 328B | 143M | 229,371% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.55 | 29.29 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.95 | 92.14 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.67 | 22.79 | 126% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.75 | 320.20 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers