Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFACX vs ZVNBX
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVNBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$72.97
Change-$0.51 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
Zevenbergen Growth Investor
Price$40.34
Change-$0.38 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets127.51M
GFACX vs ZVNBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVNBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and ZVNBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. ZVNBX (128M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVNBX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVNBX: GFACX (25 years) vs ZVNBX (10 years). ZVNBX (1.52) is less costly to investors than GFACX (1.36). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNBX (15.24). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNBX: GFACX (250) vs ZVNBX (2500). ZVNBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.38 vs. GFACX (5.07). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 24.08 vs. ZVNBX (7.55).
| GFACX | ZVNBX | GFACX / ZVNBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.30 | 105% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.52 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.445 | 7.639 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 128M | 257,813% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.07 | 8.38 | 60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.86 | 113.42 | 48% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.08 | 7.55 | 319% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.66 | 295.72 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers