Ad is loading...
GFACX vs ZVNIX
GFACX vs ZVNIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVNIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$57.16
Change-$3.41 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
Price$31.80
Change-$2.34 (-6.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.26M
GFACX vs ZVNIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVNIX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and ZVNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. ZVNIX (116M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVNIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVNIX: GFACX (24 years) vs ZVNIX (10 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than ZVNIX (1.22). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. ZVNIX (13.62). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNIX: GFACX (250) vs ZVNIX (50000). ZVNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.09 vs. GFACX (-1.75). ZVNIX return over 5 years is better than : 94.42 vs. GFACX (59.73).
| GFACX | ZVNIX | GFACX / ZVNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.00 | 136% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.22 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.003 | -12.078 | 41% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 116M | 241,379% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.75 | 7.09 | -25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.63 | 4.37 | 14% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.73 | 94.42 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.46 | N/A | - |