Ad is loading...
GFACX vs ZVNIX
GFACX vs ZVNIX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs ZVNIX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$65.66
Change-$1.58 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.33B
Zevenbergen Growth Institutional
Price$38.46
Change-$1.20 (-3.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets131.6M
GFACX vs ZVNIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. ZVNIX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a Hold and ZVNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 304B vs. ZVNIX (132M). GFACX (0.00) and ZVNIX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than ZVNIX: GFACX (24 years) vs ZVNIX (9 years). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. ZVNIX (21.85). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than ZVNIX: GFACX (250) vs ZVNIX (50000). ZVNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.07 vs. GFACX (10.15). ZVNIX return over 5 years is better than : 60.92 vs. GFACX (32.83).
| GFACX | ZVNIX | GFACX / ZVNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.980 | -0.953 | -313% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 304B | 132M | 230,303% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.15 | 20.07 | 51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.69 | 34.10 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.83 | 60.92 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.63 | N/A | - |