Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs HCMDX
GFAFX vs HCMDX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs HCMDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$69.11
Change+$0.08 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.85B
HCM Tactical Growth Investor
Price$24.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
GFAFX vs HCMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. HCMDX commentary
Mar 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and HCMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 276B vs. HCMDX (1.58B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: GFAFX (0.33) vs HCMDX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than HCMDX: GFAFX (24 years) vs HCMDX (11 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: GFAFX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.17 vs. HCMDX (-0.72). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 93.73 vs. GFAFX (70.30).
| GFAFX | HCMDX | GFAFX / HCMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.77 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.77 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.304 | -9.985 | 63% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 276B | 1.58B | 17,490% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | -0.72 | -162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.01 | 10.12 | 168% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.30 | 93.73 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.28 | 161.10 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...