Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs HCMDX
GFAFX vs HCMDX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs HCMDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.96
Change+$0.53 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
HCM Tactical Growth Investor
Price$23.70
Change+$0.22 (+0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.56B
GFAFX vs HCMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. HCMDX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and HCMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. HCMDX (1.56B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: GFAFX (0.35) vs HCMDX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than HCMDX: GFAFX (24 years) vs HCMDX (11 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: GFAFX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.57 vs. HCMDX (-6.27). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 66.88 vs. GFAFX (44.32).
| GFAFX | HCMDX | GFAFX / HCMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.77 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.77 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.440 | -14.431 | 17% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 1.56B | 18,252% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.57 | -6.27 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.10 | 15.04 | 227% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.32 | 66.88 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.32 | 135.27 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...