Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs HCMDX
GFAFX vs HCMDX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs HCMDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$65.59
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.27B
HCM Tactical Growth Investor
Price$22.22
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.47B
GFAFX vs HCMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. HCMDX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and HCMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. HCMDX (1.47B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: GFAFX (0.35) vs HCMDX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than HCMDX: GFAFX (24 years) vs HCMDX (11 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: GFAFX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.92 vs. HCMDX (-7.46). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 64.59 vs. GFAFX (37.08).
| GFAFX | HCMDX | GFAFX / HCMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.77 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.77 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.076 | -19.023 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 1.47B | 17,804% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.92 | -7.46 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.17 | -2.42 | -214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.08 | 64.59 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 47.66 | 123.09 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...