Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs HCMDX
GFAFX vs HCMDX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs HCMDX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.75
Change-$0.57 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.85B
HCM Tactical Plus Investor
Price$31.56
Change-$0.28 (-0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.03B
GFAFX vs HCMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. HCMDX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and HCMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. HCMDX (2.03B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than HCMDX: GFAFX (0.29) vs HCMDX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than HCMDX: GFAFX (25 years) vs HCMDX (11 years). HCMDX (2.77) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). HCMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 188.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HCMDX: GFAFX (250) vs HCMDX (2500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. HCMDX (13.31). HCMDX return over 5 years is better than : 69.36 vs. GFAFX (42.85).
| GFAFX | HCMDX | GFAFX / HCMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.77 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 2.77 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.967 | 16.035 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 2.03B | 16,863% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | 13.31 | 113% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.70 | 75.91 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.85 | 69.36 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.69 | 251.82 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement