Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs HGOCX
GFAFX vs HGOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs HGOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.11
Change-$0.42 (-0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$66.31
Change-$0.38 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.9B
GFAFX vs HGOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. HGOCX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and HGOCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. HGOCX (6.9B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than HGOCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs HGOCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than HGOCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs HGOCX (24 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: GFAFX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.25 vs. GFAFX (16.70). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.30 vs. HGOCX (-35.80).
| GFAFX | HGOCX | GFAFX / HGOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.86 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.86 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.099 | 12.919 | 140% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 6.9B | 4,927% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.70 | 27.25 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.48 | 112.66 | 55% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.30 | -35.80 | -135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.80 | -42.19 | -246% |