Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs HGOCX
GFAFX vs HGOCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs HGOCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.65
Change+$0.60 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.99B
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
Price$67.22
Change+$0.49 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.92B
GFAFX vs HGOCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. HGOCX commentary
Oct 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and HGOCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. HGOCX (6.92B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than HGOCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs HGOCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than HGOCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs HGOCX (24 years). HGOCX (1.86) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). HGOCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 104.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than HGOCX: GFAFX (250) vs HGOCX (2000). HGOCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.83 vs. GFAFX (14.28). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.62 vs. HGOCX (-41.04).
| GFAFX | HGOCX | GFAFX / HGOCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.86 | 36% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.86 | 36% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.187 | 13.816 | 146% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 6.92B | 4,960% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.28 | 20.83 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.40 | 117.12 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.62 | -41.04 | -106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.47 | -42.35 | -237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers