Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs ILGJX
GFAFX vs ILGJX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs ILGJX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$86.98
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Columbia Integrated Large Cap Gr Ins 3
Price$24.64
Change+$0.13 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets221.46M
GFAFX vs ILGJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. ILGJX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and ILGJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. ILGJX (221M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than ILGJX: GFAFX (0.29) vs ILGJX (0.09). GFAFX was incepted earlier than ILGJX: GFAFX (25 years) vs ILGJX (10 years). ILGJX (0.82) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). ILGJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ILGJX: GFAFX (250) vs ILGJX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. ILGJX (4.71). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.75 vs. ILGJX (10.62).
| GFAFX | ILGJX | GFAFX / ILGJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.44 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.82 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.693 | 12.020 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 221M | 152,036% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.09 | 314% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.31 | 4.71 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.88 | 43.65 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.75 | 10.62 | 374% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.22 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers