Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs JGRJX
GFAFX vs JGRJX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs JGRJX
GFAFX vs JGRJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. JGRJX commentary
Sep 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and JGRJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. JGRJX (20.5B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than JGRJX: GFAFX (0.20) vs JGRJX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than JGRJX: GFAFX (26 years) vs JGRJX (9 years). JGRJX (1.39) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.65). JGRJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. GFAFX (32.00). JGRJX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: JGRJX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.16 vs. JGRJX (-10.04). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.71 vs. JGRJX (9.21).
| GFAFX | JGRJX | GFAFX / JGRJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.25 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.39 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.779 | 1.304 | 673% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 20.5B | 1,722% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.20 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.16 | -10.04 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.15 | 38.34 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.71 | 9.21 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers