Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs KLCCX
GFAFX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.94
Change-$0.59 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$12.15
Change-$0.17 (-1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
GFAFX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. KLCCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and KLCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. KLCCX (1.26B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs KLCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs KLCCX (18 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFAFX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. KLCCX (-27.51). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 32.96 vs. KLCCX (-60.26).
| GFAFX | KLCCX | GFAFX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.96 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.157 | 15.714 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 330B | 1.26B | 26,128% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | -27.51 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 61.85 | -42.03 | -147% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.96 | -60.26 | -55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.41 | -31.59 | -280% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement