Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs KLCCX
GFAFX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.65
Change+$0.60 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.99B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$12.54
Change+$0.13 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
GFAFX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. KLCCX commentary
Oct 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and KLCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. KLCCX (1.31B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs KLCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs KLCCX (18 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFAFX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.28 vs. KLCCX (-23.68). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.62 vs. KLCCX (-57.95).
| GFAFX | KLCCX | GFAFX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.96 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.187 | 19.429 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 1.31B | 26,284% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.28 | -23.68 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 69.40 | -39.01 | -178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.62 | -57.95 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.47 | -28.71 | -350% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement