Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs KLCCX
GFAFX vs KLCCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs KLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$71.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets285.48B
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
Price$10.08
Change-$0.05 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.17B
GFAFX vs KLCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. KLCCX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and KLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. KLCCX (1.17B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than KLCCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs KLCCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than KLCCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs KLCCX (17 years). KLCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. KLCCX (18.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than KLCCX: GFAFX (250) vs KLCCX (1500). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.06 vs. KLCCX (-32.21). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.14 vs. KLCCX (-59.11).
| GFAFX | KLCCX | GFAFX / KLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.89 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.96 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.562 | -4.000 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 1.17B | 24,443% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.06 | -32.21 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.97 | -51.04 | -65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.14 | -59.11 | -75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.41 | -45.69 | -134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...