Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LGLCX
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$65.50
Change-$2.68 (-3.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$33.34
Change-$1.47 (-4.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.97B
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. LGLCX (5.97B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLCX: GFAFX (0.35) vs LGLCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLCX (14 years). LGLCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.49 vs. GFAFX (-2.11). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 50.80 vs. LGLCX (41.73).
| GFAFX | LGLCX | GFAFX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.66 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.66 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.565 | -13.408 | 56% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272B | 5.97B | 4,555% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.11 | 6.49 | -32% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.06 | 21.76 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.80 | 41.73 | 122% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.18 | 52.81 | 103% |