Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLCX
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$87.47
Change+$0.62 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.84B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$48.24
Change+$0.51 (+1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.11B
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. LGLCX (8.11B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLCX: GFAFX (0.29) vs LGLCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLCX (14 years). LGLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.03 vs. GFAFX (16.86). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.65 vs. LGLCX (27.52).
| GFAFX | LGLCX | GFAFX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.747 | 18.731 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 8.11B | 4,167% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.86 | 39.03 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.00 | 97.72 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 45.65 | 27.52 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.19 | 115.39 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement