Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLCX
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$83.19
Change+$0.26 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.99B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$46.10
Change+$0.12 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.87B
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLCX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. LGLCX (7.87B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLCX: GFAFX (0.30) vs LGLCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLCX (14 years). LGLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 44.06 vs. GFAFX (18.48). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.86 vs. LGLCX (26.72).
| GFAFX | LGLCX | GFAFX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.785 | 14.677 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 7.87B | 4,130% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.48 | 44.06 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.32 | 77.65 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.86 | 26.72 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.51 | 98.79 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement