Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLCX
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.39
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$45.74
Change+$0.39 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.6B
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. LGLCX (7.6B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLCX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LGLCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLCX (14 years). LGLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.56 vs. GFAFX (6.88). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. LGLCX (8.91).
| GFAFX | LGLCX | GFAFX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.767 | 12.811 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 7.6B | 4,303% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 12.56 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.71 | 101.20 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | 8.91 | 383% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.41 | 95.56 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement