Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LGLCX
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$77.88
Change+$0.70 (+0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.75B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$42.11
Change+$0.26 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.39B
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLCX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGLCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. LGLCX (7.39B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLCX: GFAFX (0.45) vs LGLCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLCX (14 years). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. GFAFX (31.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 41.39 vs. GFAFX (22.63). LGLCX (54.09) and GFAFX (53.38) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | LGLCX | GFAFX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.586 | 4.104 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 310B | 7.39B | 4,197% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.63 | 41.39 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.38 | 36.81 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.38 | 54.09 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.39 | 96.39 | 89% |