Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLCX
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$78.34
Change+$0.86 (+1.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders C
Price$41.35
Change+$0.61 (+1.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.99B
GFAFX vs LGLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLCX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. LGLCX (6.99B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLCX: GFAFX (0.32) vs LGLCX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLCX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLCX (14 years). LGLCX (1.65) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than LGLCX: GFAFX (250) vs LGLCX (1500). LGLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.95 vs. GFAFX (7.20). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 49.10 vs. LGLCX (33.57).
| GFAFX | LGLCX | GFAFX / LGLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.65 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.043 | 1.343 | 375% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 6.99B | 4,378% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.20 | 17.95 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.37 | 79.16 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.10 | 33.57 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.97 | 76.13 | 96% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers