Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLRX
GFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$82.93
Change-$0.15 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$51.97
Change+$0.14 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.82B
GFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLRX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLRX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. LGLRX (7.82B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLRX: GFAFX (0.30) vs LGLRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLRX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLRX (14 years). LGLRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 50.23 vs. GFAFX (21.61). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.41 vs. LGLRX (33.00).
| GFAFX | LGLRX | GFAFX / LGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.15 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.15 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.432 | 14.390 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 325B | 7.82B | 4,154% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.61 | 50.23 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.28 | 77.56 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.41 | 33.00 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.63 | 116.05 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement