Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs LGLRX
GFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$65.50
Change-$2.68 (-3.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets271.59B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$37.62
Change-$1.66 (-4.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.97B
GFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLRX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 272B vs. LGLRX (5.97B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLRX: GFAFX (0.35) vs LGLRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLRX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLRX (14 years). LGLRX (1.16) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.03 vs. GFAFX (-2.11). GFAFX (50.80) and LGLRX (49.58) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | LGLRX | GFAFX / LGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.16 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.16 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.565 | -13.308 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272B | 5.97B | 4,555% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.11 | 7.03 | -30% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.06 | 23.60 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.80 | 49.58 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.18 | 68.44 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...