Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLRX
GFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$77.05
Change-$0.26 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$46.40
Change-$0.12 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.06B
GFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLRX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a StrongBuy and LGLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. LGLRX (7.06B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLRX: GFAFX (0.32) vs LGLRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLRX: GFAFX (24 years) vs LGLRX (14 years). LGLRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.13 vs. GFAFX (8.56). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.20 vs. LGLRX (41.23).
| GFAFX | LGLRX | GFAFX / LGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.15 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.15 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.813 | 2.670 | 180% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305B | 7.06B | 4,321% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.56 | 23.13 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.76 | 66.20 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.20 | 41.23 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.18 | 98.63 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement