Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLRX
GFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$85.39
Change+$0.45 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$51.78
Change+$0.45 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.6B
GFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Hold and LGLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. LGLRX (7.6B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLRX: GFAFX (0.28) vs LGLRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLRX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLRX (14 years). LGLRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.14 vs. GFAFX (6.88). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. LGLRX (14.94).
| GFAFX | LGLRX | GFAFX / LGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.15 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.15 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.767 | 13.286 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 7.6B | 4,303% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.88 | 13.14 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 62.71 | 104.18 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | 14.94 | 228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.41 | 115.58 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement