Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GFAFX vs LGLRX
GFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs LGLRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$88.28
Change-$0.13 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.07B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$55.34
Change+$0.22 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.24B
GFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs. LGLRX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and LGLRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. LGLRX (8.24B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLRX: GFAFX (0.29) vs LGLRX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLRX: GFAFX (25 years) vs LGLRX (14 years). LGLRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than GFAFX (0.67). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: LGLRX (0) vs GFAFX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.08 vs. GFAFX (13.75). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 42.07 vs. LGLRX (24.90).
| GFAFX | LGLRX | GFAFX / LGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.15 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.15 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.685 | 21.651 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 8.24B | 4,162% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.75 | 34.08 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 77.75 | 124.16 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.07 | 24.90 | 169% |
| Returns for 10 years | 104.55 | 141.54 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers